When heavy structural plates are welded in high-restraint configurations — transfer plates, column base plates, moment frame column flanges — the weld shrinkage pulls the base metal in the through-thickness direction. Most structural steel performs well in the rolling direction (longitudinal) and across the plate width (transverse), but through-thickness ductility can be significantly lower, especially in older plate with non-metallic inclusions aligned along the rolling planes.
The result is lamellar tearing: a stair-step fracture that runs along manganese sulfide inclusion stringers in the base metal, entirely within the base metal HAZ or just outside it, invisible to most NDE until it's severe. Understanding through-thickness properties — and how to specify, test, and document them — is a quality gap in many fab shops working with heavy structural plate.
Why Through-Thickness Properties Matter
Steel plate is rolled in one direction. The rolling process elongates grains and any non-metallic inclusions (primarily manganese sulfide, MnS) into flat plates or stringers parallel to the plate surface. In the longitudinal and transverse directions, the plate's ductility is high — inclusions are oriented favorably. In the through-thickness (Z) direction, those same inclusions present as planes of weakness perpendicular to the applied stress.
When a weld in a tee or cross configuration shrinks during cooling, it pulls the base plate in the Z-direction. The through-thickness tensile stress is highest at the root of the joint, directly under the weld. If the base metal's through-thickness ductility is low — typically expressed as percent reduction in area (RA) in a Z-direction tensile test — the inclusions debond from the surrounding matrix, micro-tears link up along the rolling planes, and a lamellar tear propagates step-by-step through the plate thickness.
Lamellar tearing is most common in:
- Transfer plate tee-joints where a thick horizontal plate receives vertical plates welded to its top surface.
- Column flange connections at moment frames, particularly where the beam flange is welded directly to the column flange with a CJP groove weld.
- Heavy gusset-to-column connections with high-restraint geometry.
- Weld joints in plate thicker than 1.5 in. (38 mm) with flange-to-web tee geometry.
Rule library based on AWS D1.1:2025; verify against your governing edition.
ASTM A770: The Through-Thickness Test
ASTM A770 is the standard method for through-thickness (Z-direction) tension testing of steel plates. The test is simple: machine tensile specimens with their gauge length oriented perpendicular to the plate surface, test them in tension, and report the reduction in area at fracture.
The critical result is percent reduction in area (RA). A plate with 35% RA in the Z-direction (Z35) has significantly better through-thickness ductility than one with 15% RA. The failure mode changes from brittle step-fracture along inclusion planes to more ductile separation, giving the plate enough toughness to redistribute shrinkage stress without cracking.
Z-grade designations commonly used in structural specifications:
| Grade | Minimum Z-Direction RA |
|---|---|
| Z15 | 15% |
| Z25 | 25% |
| Z35 | 35% |
Z-testing is specified as a supplementary requirement. ASTM A6, the general requirements for structural steel, includes Supplementary Requirement S5, which invokes ASTM A770 testing. The plate manufacturer runs three specimens per heat test and reports the average RA. All three specimens must meet the minimum; no single specimen may fall more than 5 percentage points below the minimum.
Steels produced with low sulfur content (≤0.005% S, sometimes called "clean" or "low-S" heats) inherently have better through-thickness ductility because MnS inclusions are fewer and smaller. Many modern plate mills can reliably produce steel to Z35 as a standard product for common grades like A572 Gr 50 and A516 Gr 70. The additional cost over standard plate is modest (typically 5–15%) compared to the repair cost if a lamellar tear appears in a completed weld.
Recognizing Lamellar Tearing vs. Other Defects
Lamellar tears are often found during post-weld UT inspection, particularly in the base metal below fillet welds or CJP groove weld roots. The characteristic UT indication is a laminar reflector — a flat, horizontal indication parallel to the plate surface at a depth corresponding to one or more inclusion planes. It does not look like a typical slag inclusion (rounded), porosity (multiple small indications), or crack (planar but angled).
Visual inspection may reveal surface-breaking tears as a series of short, stepped cracks parallel to the weld — the classic stair-step pattern. These surface-breaking tears may not appear until days after welding as residual stress continues to drive crack growth.
Distinguish lamellar tearing from:
- Hydrogen-induced cracking (cold cracking): Also shows as planar defects in the HAZ, but typically oriented along the fusion boundary or heat-affected zone, not along rolling planes deep in the base metal. HIC usually appears within 48–72 hours after welding. Lamellar tearing may appear immediately or develop over days.
- Incomplete fusion (IF): Located at the fusion boundary, not in the base metal interior.
- Delamination: A pre-existing rolling defect in the base metal, present before welding.
If a lamellar tear is found, removal and repair requires excavating below the tear plane — sometimes completely removing and re-welding the joint — after identifying the full extent by UT mapping.
See lamellar tearing risk assessment and WPS controls for detail on joint design and welding sequence controls to reduce tearing risk.
Prevention: A Four-Part Approach
Preventing lamellar tearing is more economical than repairing it. The four controls work together:
1. Specify Z-grade base metal when risk is high. For tee-joints in plate ≥1.5 in. thick under high restraint, specify Z25 or Z35 as a supplementary requirement. The EOR should note this on structural drawings or in the project specification. Your WPS should document the Z-grade in the base metal section.
2. Joint design: reduce through-thickness stress. AWS D1.1 Annex B and standard welding engineering practice recommend reducing the Z-direction load by:
- Splitting the joint into smaller increments with intermediate stress-relief passes.
- Using beveled or buttered transitions rather than direct tee-joints.
- Minimizing the weld leg size on the Z-loaded member to only what the design requires.
3. Buttering: Apply weld butter (low-strength, highly ductile weld metal such as E308L or low-alloy wire) to the through-thickness face before making the primary joint. The ductile butter layer absorbs the shrinkage strain, protecting the base metal. This technique is especially effective on transfer plates or heavy column flanges where design permits it.
4. Low-hydrogen procedures: While low hydrogen does not directly prevent lamellar tearing (which requires no hydrogen), low-hydrogen procedures reduce residual stress and minimize the contribution of hydrogen-assisted cracking to tear initiation. Use H4 or H8 classified electrodes, maintain preheat per AWS D1.1, and limit interpass time to keep the joint warm and reduce peak residual stress.
Documentation: WPS and Project Records
When through-thickness properties are specified on a project:
On the WPS: Note the base metal designation with the supplementary requirement, e.g., "ASTM A572 Gr 50 per ASTM A6 Supplementary Requirement S5, Z35 minimum." If the project also specifies a minimum sulfur content rather than a Z-test, note the sulfur limit.
On the PQR: The base metal test coupon for the PQR qualification should come from plate meeting the Z-grade requirement if the production base metal will be Z-graded. A PQR tested on standard plate is still valid for the welding qualification, but some owner specifications require that the PQR base metal match the production plate specification including supplementary requirements.
MTR review: Before releasing Z-grade plate to production, verify the mill test report (MTR) documents the ASTM A770 test results with actual RA values, not just a statement of conformance. The actual values confirm the plate lot meets specification and provide traceability if a question arises later.
Charpy CVN testing (per AWS D1.1 Table 6.8 supplementary essential variables) addresses notch toughness in the weld and HAZ, not through-thickness ductility. These are complementary but distinct requirements. See CVN supplementary essential variables under AWS D1.1 Table 6.8 and the transfer plate and heavy column weld procedure requirements for related documentation practices.
For a WPS library that tracks supplementary base metal requirements alongside essential variables, see what's included in each plan at our pricing page.