7 min read

Slag Inclusion Controls in Structural Welds Under AWS D1.1

Causes and prevention of slag inclusions in structural steel welds, AWS D1.1:2025 radiographic and UT acceptance criteria, and WPS parameter controls for CWI inspection.

New to procedures? Start with WPS welding: what a welding procedure specification is, with a filled-in example.

Slag inclusions rank among the most common internal weld discontinuities in structural fabrication and the most preventable. They appear in NDE reports when interpass discipline breaks down — a pass started over uncleaned slag from the previous bead, a missed slag pocket in a tight root opening, or an electrode angle that traps slag at the fusion line. By the time RT or UT finds them, the joint is complete and repair is expensive.

Understanding the mechanics of slag formation, the WPS parameters that increase or decrease risk, and the AWS D1.1 acceptance criteria enables CWIs and QC managers to intercept the problem at the weld station rather than the NDE table.

What a Slag Inclusion Is

Slag is the solidified flux byproduct that forms on top of the weld pool during SMAW, FCAW, and SAW processes. Under normal conditions, slag floats to the surface as the pool solidifies and can be removed by chipping and brushing before the next pass. A slag inclusion forms when slag fails to float — when it is mechanically entrapped in the weld metal or pushed against the fusion boundary by the arc.

The result is a non-metallic, elongated or irregular solid mass inside the weld deposit. Slag inclusions reduce effective weld cross-section and introduce stress concentration points, particularly at their ends. Under cyclic loading, elongated slag inclusions oriented transverse to the load can initiate fatigue cracks.

Slag inclusions are distinct from porosity (gas voids), cold lap (incomplete fusion), or lack of penetration — though the prevention strategies overlap. The AWS D1.1 acceptance criteria treat them separately because their shape, orientation, and effect on structural performance differ from spherical gas porosity.

How Slag Gets Trapped

Improper interpass cleaning is the primary cause. If a welder starts the next pass before removing all slag from the previous bead, the fresh weld metal can flow over the remaining slag and lock it in place. This is most common at the toes of previous passes, at the edge of weave beads, and in the center of wide beads that cup at the edges.

Trapped slag in tight fit-ups or root openings. When the root opening is at the lower end of the WPS-qualified range, there may not be enough access to completely fuse through the root, and slag from the root pass can remain trapped at the root tip.

Incorrect electrode or wire angle. In SMAW, a steep drag angle can push slag ahead of the pool rather than allowing it to trail behind, resulting in slag inclusions at the fusion line. The WPS specifies work angle and travel angle; deviations contribute to slag entrapment.

Undercutting from adjacent pass. If the previous pass created undercut at the weld toe, the subsequent pass may bridge over the undercut groove without fully filling it, trapping slag in the recess. This is a fusion-type slag inclusion at the fusion boundary rather than in the weld metal interior.

Flux damp or damaged in SAW. Submerged arc welding flux that has absorbed moisture or has been partially used, reconditioning issues aside, can produce slag with altered viscosity that does not float cleanly. Flux handling requirements under AWS D1.1 address moisture control for this reason.

For the broader context of interpass cleaning requirements in AWS D1.1, see interpass cleaning and slag removal in structural welding.

WPS Parameters That Influence Slag Risk

Travel speed is among the most important WPS parameters for slag control. Travel speed that is too high leaves a narrow, peaked bead with poor sidewall fusion and inadequate time for slag to float. Travel speed that is too low produces a wide, flat bead with excessive slag generation. The WPS-qualified travel speed range should reflect what actually produces acceptable beads for the specific joint geometry.

Electrode/wire diameter and current. Undersized electrode diameter for the joint thickness reduces heat input, increases the likelihood of incomplete fusion at sidewalls, and increases slag entrapment risk. The WPS specifies electrode diameter as an essential variable; using a smaller diameter than qualified can trigger requalification requirements.

Interpass temperature minimum. While the primary slag control is mechanical cleaning, maintaining the minimum interpass temperature keeps the base metal at a temperature that supports good fusion and allows slag to flow more freely. A cold joint — one that has dropped below minimum preheat before the next pass — is more prone to both lack of fusion and slag entrapment.

Weld position. Overhead and vertical positions significantly increase slag inclusion risk compared to flat and horizontal positions. The weld pool is less stable, slag management is more difficult, and operator technique has more influence on outcome. WPS position qualification limits exist partly for this reason — a procedure qualified in the flat position cannot be used overhead without separate qualification or prequalification under AWS D1.1.

Bead profile and weave width. Excessively wide weave beads, particularly in the fill and cap passes of thick groove welds, can trap slag at the edges. The WPS can limit maximum weave width; many structural WPS documents specify stringer or limited-weave beads for fill passes in groove welds for this reason. See stringer versus weave bead WPS requirements under AWS D1.1.

AWS D1.1 Acceptance Criteria: RT and UT

Radiographic testing is the most effective NDE method for detecting and characterizing slag inclusions. RT acceptance criteria in AWS D1.1 address elongated (linear) slag inclusions separately from scattered (rounded) porosity. The criteria set limits on:

  • Maximum individual elongated slag inclusion length relative to weld thickness or a fixed limit, whichever is smaller
  • Maximum aggregate length of slag inclusions within a specified weld length segment
  • Minimum spacing between adjacent elongated slag inclusions

The specific dimensional limits differ between statically loaded and cyclically loaded (fatigue-critical) nontubular connections. Cyclically loaded connections have tighter limits because elongated slag inclusions oriented transverse to the stress axis serve as fatigue crack initiation sites. AWS D1.1:2025 tables govern; verify against your governing edition and the applicable loading category for the connection. (Rule library based on AWS D1.1:2025; verify against your governing edition.)

For a full review of the RT acceptance criteria tables for structural welds, see RT acceptance criteria for structural welds under AWS D1.1.

Ultrasonic testing detects slag inclusions as reflectors, typically showing a clean, sharp signal characteristic of a solid inclusion rather than the diffuse signal of porosity. UT is particularly effective for detecting fusion-line slag inclusions in thick CJP groove welds where RT geometry (joint thickness vs. source-to-film distance) may limit sensitivity. AWS D1.1 UT acceptance criteria use amplitude reference levels and indication severity ratings; the details depend on the UT technique and calibration standard used.

CWI Inspection Sequence to Intercept Slag

Waiting for NDE to find slag inclusions is late detection. An effective CWI program applies several earlier intercept points:

In-process visual inspection between passes. The CWI or the welder should visually confirm complete slag removal from each pass before the next is started. Any pass with slag bridged over a recess, slag locked in an undercut groove, or visible slag pockets at the fusion line should be cleaned before continuing. This cannot be delegated entirely to the welder — the CWI should perform random in-process checks on multi-pass groove welds.

Verify electrode angle and travel direction compliance. A welder who has unconsciously shifted from drag angle to push angle (or vice versa) for a particular joint position may start trapping slag without recognizing it. A CWI check at the start of a groove weld sequence can catch technique issues before they appear in RT.

Document and report NDE results by pass sequence when possible. When RT finds elongated slag inclusions, their depth location (from root to cap) can often be estimated from radiographic geometry. Correlating slag location with welder, shift, and weld sequence enables targeted process improvement rather than generic re-instruction.

Corrective Action When Slag Is Found

AWS D1.1 requires removal of rejected weld discontinuities by grinding, gouging, or chipping before repair. The WPS used for repair welding must be qualified for the process and position; the repair WPS should specify the same or tighter slag-prevention parameters as the production WPS.

Repair limits apply: AWS D1.1 sets limits on how many repair attempts are permitted for a given joint. Repeated excavation weakens the HAZ and changes the joint geometry. Tracking repair attempts per joint is part of the NCR (nonconformance report) process. For documentation requirements, see weld nonconformance report documentation under AWS D1.1.

Prevention Summary for QC Programs

A QC program that consistently controls slag inclusions has these elements in place:

  • WPS specifies maximum weave width and minimum heat input range per pass sequence
  • Interpass cleaning is a hold point, not an advisory — verified by CWI spot check on critical joints
  • Welder requalification is triggered when NDE results trend toward repeated slag rejections from a specific operator
  • Filler metal handling (SMAW electrode conditioning, FCAW wire and gas, SAW flux) follows AWS D1.1 storage and conditioning requirements

The payoff is straightforward: every slag inclusion found by RT or UT represents a repair cost that could have been prevented for the price of a wire brush and thirty seconds between passes.

FAQ

Frequently asked.

Are slag inclusions detectable by visual inspection?
Not typically. Slag inclusions are internal discontinuities trapped below the weld surface or at the fusion boundary. Visual inspection will not find them. Radiographic testing (RT) is the most direct method for detection; ultrasonic testing (UT) can also locate significant slag inclusions, particularly at the fusion line.
What AWS D1.1 acceptance criteria apply to slag inclusions under RT?
AWS D1.1 provides specific RT acceptance criteria that distinguish between elongated slag inclusions and scattered porosity, with separate limits on individual length, aggregate length within a weld length, and minimum spacing between adjacent indications. The applicable table depends on whether the structure is statically or cyclically loaded. Rule library based on AWS D1.1:2025; verify against your governing edition.
Which welding processes are most prone to slag inclusions?
SMAW (stick welding) and FCAW (flux-cored arc welding) are the most prone because they both produce slag-forming flux systems. SAW (submerged arc welding) also produces slag but its mechanized, consistent travel speed and joint access typically keep slag inclusions rare. GMAW (MIG welding with solid wire) produces no slag and is immune to this specific discontinuity type.
Does changing the WPS interpass temperature affect slag inclusion risk?
Indirectly. Higher interpass temperatures keep the weld pool more fluid, which can help slag float to the surface. But the primary prevention measure is mechanical interpass cleaning — chipping and wire brushing all slag from each pass before depositing the next. No WPS parameter substitutes for that mechanical step.

More from the blog