AWS D1.5 is the Bridge Welding Code — the governing standard for highway bridge fabrication and erection in the United States under AASHTO contracts and FHWA oversight. If your shop welds primary structure for state DOT projects, D1.5 is your code, not D1.1.
The two codes share welding physics, but their WPS requirements diverge in ways that catch fabricators off guard when they move between building and bridge work.
No prequalified WPS under D1.5
This is the single biggest procedural difference. AWS D1.1 Clause 5 lets a shop write a WPS to prequalified joint details without running qualification test plates — provided all essential variables meet prequalified limits.
D1.5 has no equivalent provision. Every welding procedure must be qualified by test. You run test plates, run the mechanical tests (tensile, bend, macroetch), and the resulting PQR supports the WPS. For a refresher on how test-based qualification compares to prequalified in cost and lead time, see PQR vs. prequalified WPS: cost comparison.
For a fab shop transitioning from building-structural work to bridge work, this means your existing WPS library probably cannot be carried forward. You are starting qualification from scratch under D1.5 procedures — even if your D1.1 PQRs cover the same base metals and processes.
Fracture-critical member (FCM) requirements
Bridge members that carry primary tension — girder flanges in positive-moment zones, tension chord members — are often designated fracture-critical. D1.5 imposes additional requirements for welds on or connecting FCMs:
CVN impact testing on the PQR. FCM qualification requires CVN (Charpy V-Notch) testing of the weld metal and HAZ at the temperature specified by the owner. This is conceptually similar to how AWS D1.1's Table 6.8 supplementary essential variables add tightening rules on top of Table 6.6 when CVN is required — but in D1.5, the FCM requirements are woven throughout the standard rather than isolated in a single supplementary table.
Heat input tracking. FCM welds require production heat-input records. The WPS states the qualified range; production records confirm every weld stayed within it. If a welder's heat input drifts — shorter arc length, changed travel speed — that is an FCM nonconformance, not a minor deviation.
Personnel qualification. In some states and for some owners, welders on FCM work must be qualified specifically under FCM procedures, not just standard welder qualification. Check the owner's project specification before assuming standard WPQ coverage extends to FCM work.
Under D1.1, CVN-required work is triggered by the contract or AHJ specifying CVN and invokes Table 6.8. Under D1.5, FCM requirements follow the FCM designation on the structural drawings — the inspector checks drawings, not just the WPS.
Base metals: M-numbers vs D1.1 groups
AWS D1.1 groups base metals by type for WPS qualification purposes. D1.5 uses AASHTO M-number designations, which align with specific ASTM standards:
- ASTM A709 Gr 36 = AASHTO M270 Gr 36
- ASTM A709 Gr 50, 50W = AASHTO M270 Gr 50, 50W
- ASTM A709 HPS 50W, HPS 70W, HPS 100W = AASHTO M270 HPS grades
High Performance Steel (HPS 70W, HPS 100W) grades carry specific preheat requirements and heat-input ceilings that reflect their microalloyed, thermomechanical-controlled-process rolling. A WPS for HPS 70W must stay within narrower voltage, amperage, and travel-speed ranges than a comparable A572 Gr 50 WPS.
Qualification on one HPS grade does not automatically cover another. The M-number groupings in D1.5 are more granular than D1.1 base-metal groups for the high-strength grades.