ASME Section IX organizes weld procedure qualification around three grouping systems: P-numbers for base metals, F-numbers for filler metals, and A-numbers for weld metal chemical composition. P-numbers and F-numbers appear on almost every PQR record; A-numbers receive less attention in shop training. But for the major arc welding processes, a change in A-number is an essential variable — and shops that miss it during procedure reviews end up with WPS coverage gaps that surface during NBIC audits, ASME witness inspections, or third-party quality assessments.
What A-numbers classify and why they exist
F-numbers group filler metals based on their usability characteristics — the type of electrode and the welding technique it requires. An E7018 (F-4) and an E6010 (F-3) are in different F-number groups because they require fundamentally different welding techniques. F-numbers are assigned based on how the filler metal behaves in the hand of the welder.
A-numbers are different. They classify the deposited weld metal by chemical analysis — what the weld bead actually contains after the electrode burns, the flux reacts, and the puddle solidifies. This matters because two electrodes can be identical F-numbers (same technique requirements) while depositing chemically different weld metal. The F-number doesn't tell you what alloy you just put into the joint; the A-number does.
QW-442 in ASME Section IX lists the A-number groups with chemical composition ranges for each group. A-1 covers carbon steel weld metal — manganese-silicon systems without significant alloy additions — and is by far the most common group in structural and pressure vessel work with carbon steel base metals. A-2 covers carbon-molybdenum weld metal. A-3 through A-5 cover progressively higher chromium and molybdenum alloy steels (used in high-temperature pressure vessel and piping work). A-8 through A-12 cover austenitic stainless steel and high-nickel alloy weld metals.
The practical point: when you burn an E7018-A1 SMAW electrode, the deposited weld metal contains approximately 0.5% molybdenum — that's an A-2 weld metal, not A-1, despite the "7018" designation suggesting plain carbon steel. Two E7018-classified electrodes from different manufacturers may deposit A-1 or A-2 weld metal depending on their specific wire chemistry. The F-number is the same for both; the A-number may not be.
A-number as an essential variable in QW-404
ASME IX QW-404 addresses filler metal essential variables for arc welding processes. For SMAW, SAW, GTAW, GMAW, and FCAW, a change to a different A-number is listed as an essential variable in QW-404. This means:
- If a PQR was run with A-1 weld metal and the shop wants to substitute a filler that deposits A-2 weld metal, a new PQR is required. The A-1 PQR does not cover A-2 production welding.
- If a shop runs two electrodes of the same F-number classification — say, two different brands of E7018 — but one is A-1 and the other is A-2, switching between them on a production weld is an essential variable change even though the F-number and electrode designation are identical.
- The WPS must identify the A-number of the qualified weld metal, and that A-number must match (or be supported by) the PQR record.
This is distinct from an F-number change. Both an F-number change and an A-number change can independently trigger requalification. A production change that happens to change both (e.g., switching from SMAW to GMAW with a different alloy filler) triggers both essential variables simultaneously.
The A-1 assumption and where it breaks down
For plain carbon steel work — structural steel, carbon steel pressure vessels, pipework in A-106 or A-53 material — almost all qualified SMAW, GMAW, and FCAW procedures use A-1 weld metal. The filler metals in routine use (E7018, ER70S-6, E71T-1C) all deposit A-1 weld metal chemistry, so shops often build procedures without ever consciously considering the A-number. The A-number field on the PQR is filled in as "A-1" and no one thinks about it again.
The assumption breaks down in three situations:
Low-alloy or chrome-moly filler substitution. A shop qualified on carbon steel fillers (A-1) wants to use a low-hydrogen chrome-moly electrode (such as E8018-B2, which deposits A-3 or A-4 weld metal) for a repair or upgrade. The existing A-1 PQR does not support this. A new PQR with the chrome-moly electrode is required — and the PQR must include the appropriate tensile and bend tests, and possibly impact tests if applicable, on deposited A-3 or A-4 weld metal.
AWS A5 specification revisions. When a filler metal manufacturer revises the wire chemistry for an existing classification — changing alloy additions, adjusting trace element limits — the deposited weld metal chemistry may shift across an A-number boundary even though the electrode classification designation is unchanged. This happened when the A5.36 specification was introduced for flux-cored electrodes with expanded designator systems. Shops that assume a classification is always A-1 without verifying against QW-442 can end up with a coverage gap.
Stainless steel and high-alloy work. For shops doing ASME IX work on austenitic stainless steel or nickel alloys, A-numbers become more differentiated. The transition from 308L filler (A-8) to 309L filler (A-9) crosses an A-number boundary even though both are austenitic stainless. A shop that qualifies a WPS for a 308L stainless filler and then substitutes 309L in production has made an essential variable change without a supporting PQR.
For an overview of how P-numbers and F-numbers interact with base metal and filler metal selection, see ASME IX P-numbers and F-numbers explained.